SaaS Platform Redesign & Scalability for Vinobridge
Services Covered:

E-commerce & Retail
15 months
200K - 999K
1 March 2024
1-5
Offshore
Project Capability Score (PCS)
Project Capability Score (PCS) estimates how capable Quintegro is of successfully delivering a project like this, based on its past experience, track record, and ability to handle similar work. Learn more about PCS
Client
Vinobridge Technologies
Project Summary
Key Challenges
- Stabilize and improve the MVP inherited from a previous vendor.
- Redesign the frontend and user experience to support retailer adoption.
- Build a scalable architecture to support growth in distributors and retailers.
- Automate data processes with an application-driven ETL for reliability and speed.
- Manage end-to-end product development with minimal oversight required from the client team.
Project Deliverables
- Assessment of the existing MVP and a roadmap for improvements.
- Resolution of critical UX issues and a redesigned frontend using React.
- Transition of ETL to an application-driven model (app-driven ETL).
- A component-based design system for the frontend.
- Ongoing product delivery and weekly check-ins to manage development.
Project Solution
Project Outcome
- Grew the retailer base from 1 to 13 and onboarded a second distributor.
- A significantly more stable, intuitive, and effective platform that supports revenue growth and operational efficiency.
- Quintegro now runs the end-to-end process and maintains weekly alignment and responsive communication.
Platforms
Web
SaaS
Tech Stack
React.js
Client Endorsement
Overall Review Rating
Timeliness
Cost Rating
Willing to Refer
Quality of Deliverables
“Quintegro's work has helped the client grow their retailer base from one to 13 and onboard a second distributor. The platform is now more stable, intuitive, and effective. Quintegro runs the entire process and meets with the client weekly to align priorities and is responsive via Slack.”
Note: This endorsement is based on publicly available client feedback from external review sources.
