Our Proprietary Rating Framework

Vendor shortlisting made faster, easier, and reliable

Project Capability Score (PCS) transforms a company’s past project experience into measurable insights to help determine whether they are the right fit for your project.

Selection Problem

Traditional Metrics vs. PCS

PCS is a structured evaluation methodology that goes beyond traditional vendor directories and time-consuming manual reviews to compare outsourcing companies more fairly and identify stronger project matches with less effort.

  • Globe with location pins representing vendor directory listings

    Vendor Directories

    Useful for discovery but may not reflect exact project requirements.

  • Documents with magnifying glass representing manual vendor review

    Manual Vendor Review

    Has a broad and generic view. It is very one-dimensional.

PCS Framework

6 Factors That Help You Choose Better

Instead of relying on one broad indicator, PCS looks at a range of inputs together in context. Each signal is considered in relation to the project. This makes the score more useful for real decision making.

  • Overlapping circles representing project similarity

    Project Similarity

    How closely a company's previous work aligns with the project you are planning.

  • Lightning bolt representing execution capability

    Execution Capability

    Whether the company has delivered similar scope and complexity before.

  • People silhouettes with stars representing experience depth

    Experience Depth

    How strong its experience is in the areas that matter most for your project.

  • Circular arrows representing consistency signals

    Consistency Signals

    Whether performance appears steady across similar projects.

  • Chess king representing scalability readiness

    Scalability Readiness

    Whether the company is ready for the scope and growth required for the project.

  • Puzzle pieces representing contextual fit

    Contextual Fit

    How well the company matches your domain, technology, and delivery model.

How It Works

From project requirement to smarter shortlist

After you look at similar projects and companies, PCS helps you see which vendors fit your scope best.

01

Scope out your project needs

Identify service type, technology, industry, scope, and delivery expectations.

02

Research projects

Compare vendors based on actual projects they have done vs. your needs.

03

Compare project PCS

Compare PCS of projects that are similar to your requirements.

04

Shortlist Vendors

Screen vendors based on company signals, similar projects, and PCS.

Behind the scores

What PCS looks at

These signals create a fuller view of vendor fit beyond reviews and profile information.

  • 01

    Recency Factor

    Recent projects help indicate what a company is likely to deliver well today.

  • 02

    Technology Stack

    Shows familiarity with tools and technologies relevant to the work.

  • 03

    Project Services

    Highlights repeated service strengths across completed engagements.

  • 04

    Industry

    Identifies domain experience where expectations and constraints matter.

  • 05

    Project Size

    Indicates whether similar scale and complexity have been handled before.

  • 06

    Company Background

    Adds broader context such as experience and total completed projects.

Project Capability Score

PCS gauge indicating a score in the 80 to 89 range

88/100

Strong Match

Project Scale

Strong

Tech Stack

Strong

Services

Good

Industry

Strong

Note: Illustrative breakdown sample. Actual scoring is based on Enosis Outsourcing’s proprietary evaluation framework.

Score Interpretation

How to Read the PCS Score

PCS uses a 0–100 scale to measure how strongly a project reflects a company’s relevant experience. A higher score indicates stronger capability for similar work.

  • Below 60

    Limited Match

    This company has little exposure to this type of projects.

  • 61–79

    Good Match

    This company has a fair amount of experience working on similar projects.

  • 80–100

    Strong Match

    This company has extensive experience working on similar projects.

  • 80–100

    Strong Match

    This company has extensive experience working on similar projects.

  • 61–79

    Good Match

    This company has a fair amount of experience working on similar projects.

  • Below 60

    Limited Match

    This company has little exposure to this type of projects.

Example Scenario

Two projects may look similar, but fit differently

A public rating can show that both vendors are credible. PCS helps clarify which one is more aligned with your project requirement.

  • Software Development

    PCS gauge indicating a score in the 90 to 100 range

    94/100


    Key Factors:

    Project Match Signal

    67/70

    Strong match across scope, services, platform, and tech.

    Company Track Record

    19/21

    Strong delivery record with proven experience and recent work.

    Project Client Rating

    8/9

    Strong client feedback across key delivery areas.


    Company A
    Strong Fit
  • Software Development

    PCS gauge indicating a score in the 70 to 79 range

    71/100


    Key Factors:

    Project Match Signal

    51/70

    Moderate match with some gaps in project fit.

    Company Track Record

    16/21

    Good delivery record, with a few weaker signals.

    Project Client Rating

    4/9

    Moderate client feedback for this project.


    Company B
    Limited Fit

Make vendor shortlisting faster and more reliable

PCS helps buyers cut through surface-level signals and focus on companies that are better aligned with the project ahead.